Online-Trading Portfolio-Tracker Research Back-Office MF-Tracker
BSE Prices delayed by 5 minutes... << Prices as on May 02, 2024 >>   ABB 6679.35 [ 2.09 ]ACC 2527.9 [ -0.13 ]AMBUJA CEM 625.4 [ 0.92 ]ASIAN PAINTS 2973.8 [ 3.36 ]AXIS BANK 1149.75 [ -1.41 ]BAJAJ AUTO 9103.8 [ 2.20 ]BANKOFBARODA 279.3 [ -0.82 ]BHARTI AIRTE 1306.15 [ -1.26 ]BHEL 292.65 [ 3.91 ]BPCL 634.8 [ 4.45 ]BRITANIAINDS 4760.25 [ -0.22 ]CIPLA 1419.55 [ 1.31 ]COAL INDIA 453.25 [ -0.23 ]COLGATEPALMO 2811.4 [ -0.47 ]DABUR INDIA 524.3 [ 3.30 ]DLF 895.8 [ 0.43 ]DRREDDYSLAB 6288.3 [ 1.34 ]GAIL 205 [ -1.91 ]GRASIM INDS 2434.3 [ 0.97 ]HCLTECHNOLOG 1360.4 [ -0.52 ]HDFC 2729.95 [ -0.62 ]HDFC BANK 1533 [ 1.05 ]HEROMOTOCORP 4562.45 [ 0.44 ]HIND.UNILEV 2225.45 [ -0.24 ]HINDALCO 641.4 [ -0.39 ]ICICI BANK 1139.9 [ -1.05 ]IDFC 121.35 [ -0.29 ]INDIANHOTELS 575.95 [ -0.14 ]INDUSINDBANK 1505.7 [ -0.65 ]INFOSYS 1414.85 [ -0.44 ]ITC LTD 439.1 [ 0.80 ]JINDALSTLPOW 941.85 [ 1.15 ]KOTAK BANK 1575.8 [ -2.95 ]L&T 3597.6 [ 0.10 ]LUPIN 1647.75 [ 0.14 ]MAH&MAH 2184.45 [ 1.31 ]MARUTI SUZUK 12793.75 [ -0.10 ]MTNL 38.04 [ -2.34 ]NESTLE 2511.3 [ 0.21 ]NIIT 105.25 [ -0.47 ]NMDC 258.45 [ 1.63 ]NTPC 369.35 [ 1.72 ]ONGC 282.65 [ -0.07 ]PNB 138 [ -2.20 ]POWER GRID 313.45 [ 3.91 ]RIL 2932.1 [ 0.03 ]SBI 830.05 [ 0.53 ]SESA GOA 410.7 [ 3.22 ]SHIPPINGCORP 227.55 [ -0.07 ]SUNPHRMINDS 1518.4 [ 1.07 ]TATA CHEM 1100.7 [ 2.65 ]TATA GLOBAL 1091.15 [ -1.51 ]TATA MOTORS 1027.95 [ 1.99 ]TATA STEEL 167.35 [ 1.45 ]TATAPOWERCOM 457.7 [ 1.91 ]TCS 3863.75 [ 1.08 ]TECH MAHINDR 1266.9 [ 0.39 ]ULTRATECHCEM 9981.25 [ 0.15 ]UNITED SPIRI 1194.3 [ 1.56 ]WIPRO 457.25 [ -1.09 ]ZEETELEFILMS 143.9 [ -2.11 ] BSE NSE
You can view full text of the latest Auditor's Report for the company.

BSE: 505744ISIN: INE529A01010INDUSTRY: Auto Ancl - Engine Parts

BSE   ` 362.95   Open: 364.95   Today's Range 358.00
368.00
-1.85 ( -0.51 %) Prev Close: 364.80 52 Week Range 312.50
431.40
Year End :2018-03 

Report on the Standalone Financial Statements

1. We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of Federal-Mogul Goetze (India) Limited (“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss (including Other Comprehensive Income), the Cash Flow Statement and the Statement of Changes in Equity, for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements

2. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’) with respect to the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs (financial position), profit or loss (financial performance including other comprehensive income), cash flows and changes in equity of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (‘Ind AS’) specified under Section 133 of the Act. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone financial statements based on our audit.

4. We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

5. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone financial statements are free from material misstatement.

6. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial controls relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An a udit also inc l ude s evalua ting the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

7. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on these standalone financial statements. Opinion

8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India including Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act, of the state of affairs (financial position) of the Company as at 31 March 2018, and its profit (financial performance including other comprehensive income), its cash flows and the changes in equity for the year ended on that date.

Other matter paragraph

9. The Company had prepared separate sets of statutory financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2017 and 31 March 2016 in accordance with Accounting Standards prescribed under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 (as amended) on which we issued auditor’s reports to the shareholders of the Company dated 19May 2017 and 13 May 2016, respectively. These financial statements have been adjusted for the differences in the accounting principles adopted by the Company on transition to Ind AS, which have also been audited by us. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

10. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order”) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in the Annexure I a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.

11. Further to our comments in Annexure I, as required by Section143(3) of the Act, we report that:

a. we have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;

b. in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books;

c. the standalone financial statements dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;

d. in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements comply with Ind AS specified under Section 133 of the Act;

e. on the basis of the written representations received from the directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section164(2) of the Act;

f. we have also audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as of 31 March 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date and our report dated 29 May 2018 as per annexure II expressed an unqualified opinion; and.

g. with respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 (as amended), in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:

i. the Company, as detailed in Note 39 to the standalone financial statements, has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position;

ii. the Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;

iii. there were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company; and

iv. the disclosure requirements relating to holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes were applicable for the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 which are not relevant to these standalone financial statements. Hence, reporting under this clause is not applicable.

Annexure I

Based on the audit procedures performed for the purpose of reporting a true and fair view on the financial statements of the Company and taking into consideration the information and explanations given to us and the books of account and other records examined by us in the normal course of audit, and to the best of our knowledge and belief, we report that:

(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.

(b) The Company has a regular program of physical verification of its fixed assets under which fixed assets are verified in a phased manner over a period of three years which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.

(c) The title deeds of all the immovable properties (which are included under the head ‘Property, plant and equipment’) are held in the name of the Company.

(ii) In our opinion, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year and no material discrepancies between physical inventory and book records were noticed on physical verification.

(iii) The Company has not granted any l oa n , secu red or u n secu red to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 189 of the Act. Accordingly, the provisions of clauses 3(iii)(a), 3(iii)(b) and 3(iii)(c) of the Order are not applicable.

(iv) In our opinion the, Company has complied with the provisions of sections 185 and 186 of the Act in respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security.

(v) In our opinion, the Company has not accepted any deposits within the meaning of Sections 73 to 76 of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 (as amended). Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(v) of the Order are not applicable.

(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under clause Section 148 of the Act in respect of Company’s products and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the cost records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or complete.

(vii)(a) The Company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and other material statutory dues, as applicable, to the appropriate authorities. Further, no undisputed amounts payable in respect thereof were outstanding at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they become payable.

(b) The dues outstanding in respect of income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise and value added tax on account of any dispute, are as follows:

Statement of Disputed Dues

Name of the statute

Nature of dues

Amount (Rs. in lacs)

Amount paid under protest (Rs. in lacs)

Period to which the amount relates

Forum where dispute is pending

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

94.67

-

2002-2003

Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

41.34

-

2014-2015

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

16.54

-

1995-1996 and 1996-1997

Honorable High Court, Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

432.49

-

1997-1998

Honorable High Court, Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

83.26

-

1998-1999

Honorable Supreme Court, Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

59.68

-

1999-2000

Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

38.86

-

1999-2000

Honorable Supreme Court, Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

20.84

-

2000-2001

Honorable Supreme Court, Delhi

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

80.84

-

2001-2002

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

13.81

-

2002-2003

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

42.44

-

2004-2005

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

3.94

-

2005-2006

Assessing Officer for Appeal Effect

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

74.24

-

2008-2009

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

217.36

-

2010-2011

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

343.34

-

2011-2012

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Income tax Act, 1961

Income tax

318.31

-

2012-2013

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

9.34

-

1987-1990

Honorable High Court of Punjab and Haryana

The Central Excise Act,1944

Excise Duty

1.18

-

1995-1996

Joint Commissioner of Central Excise

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

1.36

-

2003-2004

Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Patiala, Punjab

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

1.76

-

1997-1999

Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Patiala, Punjab

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

1.86

-

1997-1998

Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Patiala, Punjab

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

6.96

-

1998-1999

Joint Commissioner of Central Excise

The Central Excise Act,1944

Excise Duty

15.13

-

2000-2001 Honorable Supreme Court and 2001-2002

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

44.12

1.33

2004 - 2005

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

104.54

-

2001-2004

Additional Commissioner

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

3.32

-

2001-2002

Additional Commissioner of Central Excise

The Central Excise Act, 1944

Excise Duty

29.45

29.45

2010-2014

Commissioner, Gurgaon

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

96.11

-

2005-2011

Joint Commissioner of Central Excise, Patiala, Punjab

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

86.44

25

2006-2007

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

7.10

-

Jan 2009 -August 2009

Assistant Commissioner, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

55.28

-

2006-2012

Joint Commissioner, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

310.40

330

2008-2012

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

16.61

-

2009-2010

Joint Commissioner, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

13.81

-

2009-2012

Commissioner (Appeals)

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

10.70

-

2011-2013

Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

5.81

0.58

2012-2013

Commissioner of Central Excise

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

18.12

-

2012-2013

Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

8.34

-

2013-2014

Commissioner of Central Excise

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

113.70

4.60

May 2005 to July 2005

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

194.00

14.60

Oct 2008 to March 2013

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

5.90

-

2014

Deputy Commissioner

Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax)

Service tax

19.11

-

2013-2014

Additional Commissioner

Karnataka VAT Act, 2003

Value added tax

97.00

163.57

1996-2002

Honorable High court of Karnataka

West Bengal VAT Act,2003

Value added tax

1.56

-

2001-2002

Assistant Commissioner, Kolkata

West Bengal VAT Act,2003

Value added tax

1.87

-

2004-2005

Assistant Commissioner, Kolkata

Bihar VAT Act,2005

Value added tax

25.66

25.67

2005-2006

Additional Commissioner, Patna

(viii) The Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any bank or financial institution or government during the year. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the year.

(ix) The Company did not raise moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) and in our opinion, the term loans were applied for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.

(x) No fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the period covered by our audit.

(xi) The Company has provided managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act 2013.

(xii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/ society. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable.

(xiii) In our opinion all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of Act, where applicable, and the requisite details have been disclosed in the standalone financial statements etc., as required by the applicable IND AS.

(xiv) During the year, the Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures.

(xv) In our opinion, the Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with the directors or persons connected with them covered under section 192 of the Act.

(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

Independent Auditor’s Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘the Act’)

1.In conjunction with our audit of the standalone financial statements of Federal Mogul (Goetze) India Limited (‘the Company”) as of and for the year ended 31 March 2018, we have audited the internal financial controls over financial reporting (IFCoFR) of the Company as at that date. Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls

2. The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of the Company’s business, including adherence to the Company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act.

Auditor’s Responsibility

3. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s IFCoFR based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (‘ICAI’) and deemed to be prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of IFCoFR, and the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls Over Financial Reporting (‘the Guidance Note’) issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate IFCoFR were established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.

4. Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the IFCoFR and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of IFCoFR includes obtaining an understanding of IFCoFR, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.

5. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s IFCoFR.

Meaning of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

6. A company’s IFCoFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s IFCoFR include those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting

7. Because of the inherent limitations of IFCoFR, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the IFCoFR to future periods are subject to the risk that the IFCoFR may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Opinion

8. In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, adequate internal financial controls over financial reporting and such controls were operating effectively as at 31 March 2018, based on the internal control over financial reporting criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

For Walker Chandiok & Co LLP

Chartered Accountants

Firm’s Registration No.: 001076N/N500013

per Anamitra Das

Partner

Membership No.:062191

Place: Gurugram

Date:29th May 2018