We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Panjon Limited
(the Company), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2014,
the Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow Statement for the year
then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company's Management is responsible for the preparation of these
financial statements that give a true and fair view of the financial
position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in
accordance with the Accounting Standards notified under the Companies
Act, 1956 (the Act) read with the General Circular 15/2013 dated 13th
September, 2013 of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of
Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 and in accordance with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India. This responsibility
includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control
relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial
statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AUDITORS' RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness
of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.
BASIS FOR QUALIFIED OPINION
Inventories : The company's inventories lying at branches etc. could
neither be verified nor their net realisable is ascertainable. It was
observed by the management that the stocks lying at the branches were
not in saleable condition and the same was expired/damaged due to
improper storage/moisture/pilferage etc. Same stock has been
appearing in the books since previous years. The value of such stocks
in books is Rs. 3,08,56,189/-. management has not stated the
inventories at lower of cost and net realisable value, which
constitutes a departure from the Accounting Standards referred to in
subsection (3C) of Sec 211 of the Act. The company's records indicate
that had the management stated the inventories at the lower of cost and
net realisable value since it is not realisable the entire value needs
to be written off, an amount of Rs. 3,08,56,189/- would have been
required to write the inventories down to their net realisable value.
Accordingly, cost of sales would have been increased by Rs. 3,08,56,189
and profit for the year, shareholders value and inventories, would have
decreased by Rs. 3,08,56,189/- (profit would have turned into loss),
income tax would have reduced by Rs. 1,49,000/-.
Patent and copyright : The management had to write off Rs. 97,92,507/-
every year on patents and copyrights for 5 years and thus, total
depreciation of Rs. 4,89,62,536/- would have been written off in a
period of 5 years. So far management has not written off any amount on
patents and copyright of Rs. 4,89,62,536/-, which is a departure from
the Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of Sec 211 of
the Act. The company's records indicate that had management written off
patents and copyrights, then intangible fixed assets, net profit for
the year and shareholders funds, would have been lower by Rs.
4,89,62,536/- or loss would have increased.
Deferred revenue Expenses : The management has not written off Deferred
Revenue Expenses of Rs. 1,54,95,605/-, which is a departure from the
Accounting Standards referred to in subsection (3C) of Sec. 211 of the
Act. The company's records indicate that if the management had written
off these deferred revenue expenses, the profit for the year,
shareholders funds would have been lower by Rs. 1,54,95,605/- or loss
would have increased.
QUALIFIED OPINION
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified opinion paragraph, the aforesaid
financial statements give the information required by the Act in the
manner so required and give a true and fair view and are in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31st, 2014;
(b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit of
the Company for the year ended on that date; and
(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
REPORT ON OTHER LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (the
Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section
227(4A) of the Act, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by Section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books.
c. The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the
books of account.
d. Except for the effects of the matters described inbasis for
qualified opinion paragraph, in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the
Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement comply with
Accounting Standards notified under the Act read with the General
Circular 15/2013 dated 13th September, 2013 of the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs in respect of Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013.
e. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors as on March 31, 2014, taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2014,
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the
Act.
Annexure referred to in the Auditor's Report to the members of M/S
PANJON LTD., INDORE on the accounts of the Company for the year ended
31st March, 2014.
On the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate and in terms
of the information and explanation given to us, we state that:-
In terms of the information and explanations given to us and the books
and records examined by us in the normal course of audit and to the
best of our knowledge and belief we state that
(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) As explained to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management during the year. There is a regular program of
verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
size of the company and the nature of its assets. No material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) In our opinion, the company has not disposed of substantial parts
of fixed assets during the year and the going concern status of the
company is not affected.
(ii) (a) The inventory has not been physically verified during the year
by the management and were not made available for verification. In our
opinion, the frequency of verification is not reasonable. Quantity,
value and location of brought forward/carried forward stock has not
been verified by us and it is not verifiable and not properly
maintained. Also nature of the goods is expirable and cannot be
consumed after lapse of certain time or if not stored properly, company
has not taken stock quantity and value from that perspective and hence
exact amount cannot be ascertained.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are not reasonable and inadequate in relation to the
size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is not maintaining proper records of inventory. As
informed to us, the discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book records were material and not dealt with
in the books of account.
(iii) (a) The Company has received Unsecured Loans and Trade Deposits
from parties listed in the Register required to be maintained under
section 301, which are treated as unsecured loan. The total No. of
parties (directors and relative) are two and amount outstanding as on
31.03.14 is Rs. 105.54 lacs (Previous year R804.61) and maximum
outstanding is Rs. 270.04 lacs. According to the information and
explanation given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions of the loan are prima-facie not prejudicial to the interest
of the company. The Company is regular in repayment of deposits and
there are no overdue.
(b) The company has not granted unsecured loans, advances to the
Companies, Firms and Parties listed in the Register required to be
maintained under section 301. The Total No. Of Parties are nil and
amount outstanding as on 31.03.2014 is Rs. nil (Previous year Rs. 7.61
lacs) and maximum outstanding is Rs. nil. According to the information
and explanations given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions of the loan are prima-facie, prejudicial to the interest of
the Company.
(c) The debtors are not regular in repaying the principal amounts as
stipulated and also irregular in payment of interest.
(d) In our opinion the company has not taken reasonable steps to
recover the loan amount.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the internal control is not adequate commensurate with the
size of the company and the nature of its business with regard to
purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, we have observed
continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls.
(v) (A) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
have been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts of
arrangements entered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lacs in
respect of any party during the year have been made but the
reasonability of the prices having regard to prevailing market prices
at that time cannot be ascertained.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not accepted deposits hence provisions of
section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act are not applicable to
company, except Business deposits and from directors.
(vii) In our opinion, the company does not have Internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) As informed and explained to us, the Central Government has
ordered for maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the
companies Act vide order dated 16/03/2006 of the Central Government but
the cost audit has not been completed till date.
(ix) (a) The company is generally irregular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education protection fund, ESIC, sales tax, income-tax
TDS, service tax, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to
it. Exact amount of dues is not known as relevant records could not be
produced.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of dues as at
31/3/2014, which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are
as follows.
Name of the Nature of the Amount under Forum where
Statute Dues dispute not yet dispute is pending
deposited
Excise Duty 2002-03 167530/- Stayed from High Court
Income Tax FY 1993-1994
(A.Y. 1994-95) 142130/- Rectification field
(x) The company does not have accumulated loss, as at the end of year
the company more than fifty percent of its net worth subject to
qualifications in the audit report. The company has not incurred any
cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit or in the
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company is not in default of repayment of dues to
financial institution/Bank as at 31.03.2014.
(xii) We are of the opinion that the company has not granted loans and
advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares,
debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) As informed and explained to us the company has not given
guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions.
(xvi) The Company has not raised any term loan during the year under
review.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, and
on an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we
report that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for
long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has made preferential allotment of 1,00,00,000 eq. shares of
Rs. 10/- each for cash at par, out of which 65,00,000 equity shares of
Rs. 10/- each for cash at par have been issued to parties and companies
covered in the register required to be maintained under section 301 of
the Act.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company had not issued any
debenture.
(xx) The company has not made any Public issue of shares during the
year.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
year.
PLACE : INDORE For Trilok Jain & Co.
DATE : 22nd September, 2014 Chartered Accountants
FRN 00341C
(T.C. Jain)
Partner
M.No. 012712 |